The downside of course is a lack of precise control over what gets masked from each source-image in the case of moving objects.
#Photomatix essentials tutorial 32 bit#
I believe the output is a 32 bit "raw" file. It simply fills in detail for the over and underexposed areas without producing that overdone HDR look. I use LR's merge to HDR, mainly because it doesn't go wild with the tone mapping. I find HDR Pro much easier than Photomatix but, as I say, it's a long time since I used the latter. The only thing I can say in favour of the LR/ACR system is that it very simple. I've tried in in both LR and ACR and found it equally mediocre in both. It is not the same as the LR HDR merge tool, which I find very inflexible it is also available in Adobe Camera Raw (ACR), the raw conversion in PS. If you have the subscription version of you automatically have this. I haven't used Photomatix for some years because I get better results from HDR Pro, which is a feature in Photoshop. So, my question is for those who have used the program, is Photomatix Pro worth the $100 or is the LR merge which is part of the LR software close enough so that it isn't worth the money insofar as the results of each. My thought is that I have read that Photomatix Pro is probably the best for merging bracketed photos and getting the best results, but LR has its own HDR merge tool which puts together bracketed images and I think does a decent job. Not sure if this belongs here or another forum.I was thinking about posting in general photo techniques, but that forum gets so little play, it would be nice to have some answers in a more timely fashion so I post this inquiry here.
0 kommentar(er)
